This page contains the text of a proposed rule adopted by the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission, a summary of the proposed rule, and the official copy of the proposed rule published in the Missouri Register, along with any materials incorporated by reference.
REPORTS
MoDOT's Executive Order 17-03 Full Report | MoDOT's Executive Order 17-03 Summary | Periodic Rule Review Report June 2022 | Periodic Rule Review Report June 2022 Appendix A
Pending Proposal
7 CSR 10-10.010 Definitions.
The Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission is deleting sections ( l ), (2), ( 4), (6), (8), (9), ( 11 ), ( 12), ( 13), (16), (17), (18), (20), (21 ), (22), (23), (25), and (26), and renumbering accordingly.
Date Posted: 3/10/26
Summary: This rule has been in effect since July 9, 1991. The proposed amendment and rescissions are needed now to streamline contractor oversight, reduce administrative burden, and align with current best practices in performance recognition and procurement. The existing rating system is outdated and resource intensive. This amendment is to remove unused definitions.
Pending Proposal
7 CSR 10-10.020 Explanation of Contractor Performance Rating System.
The Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission is amending sections (I) and (2) and deleting section
(3).
Date Posted: 3/10/26
Summary: This rule has been in effect since July 9, 1991. The proposed amendment and rescissions are needed now to streamline contractor oversight, reduce administrative burden, and align with current best practices in performance recognition and procurement. The existing rating system is outdated and resource intensive. This amendment identifies the rating and recognition system.
Pending Proposal
7 CSR 10-10.030 Rating Categories for Evaluating the Performance of a Contractor.
This rule sat forth the rating criteria used in evaluating the performance of contractors awarded commission projects.
Date Posted: 3/10/26
Summary: This rule has been in effect since July 9, 1991. The proposed amendment and rescissions are needed now to streamline contractor oversight, reduce administrative burden, and align with current best practices in performance recognition and procurement. The existing rating system is outdated and resource intensive. This rule is being rescinded to eliminate the annual rating of contractor performance.
Pending Proposal
7 CSR 10-10.040 Contractor Performance Project Evaluation Used for Determining Contractor Performance.
This rule described generally the form used in rating and reporting a contractor's performance on a contract, according to the provisions of this chapter.
Date Posted: 3/10/26
Summary: This rule has been in effect since July 9, 1991. The proposed amendment and rescissions are needed now to streamline contractor oversight, reduce administrative burden, and align with current best practices in performance recognition and procurement. The existing rating system is outdated and resource intensive. This rule is being rescinded to eliminate the annual rating of contractor performance.
Pending Proposal
7 CSR 10-10.050 Procedure and Schedule for Completing the Contractor Performance Project Evaluation.
This rule described the procedures and schedule which apply to the completion of the contractor performance project evaluation.
Date Posted: 3/10/26
Summary: This rule has been in effect since July 9, 1991. The proposed amendment and rescissions are needed now to streamline contractor oversight, reduce administrative burden, and align with current best practices in performance recognition and procurement. The existing rating system is outdated and resource intensive. This rule is being rescinded to eliminate the annual rating of contractor performance.
Pending Proposal
7 CSR 10-10.060 Explanation of Standard Deviation Rating System for All Contractors.
This rule described the procedures and rating values used in annual ratings of contractors.
Date Posted: 3/10/26
Summary: This rule has been in effect since July 9, 1991. The proposed amendment and rescissions are needed now to streamline contractor oversight, reduce administrative burden, and align with current best practices in performance recognition and procurement. The existing rating system is outdated and resource intensive. This rule is being rescinded to eliminate the annual rating of contractor performance.
Pending Proposal
7 CSR 10-10.070 Procedure for Annual Rating of Contractors.
This rule described the procedures used in annual rating of contractors.
Date Posted: 3/10/26
Summary: This rule has been in effect since July 9, 1991. The proposed amendment and rescissions are needed now to streamline contractor oversight, reduce administrative burden, and align with current best practices in performance recognition and procurement. The existing rating system is outdated and resource intensive. This rule is being rescinded to eliminate the annual rating of contractor performance.
Pending Proposal
7 CSR 10-10.080 Definition of Nonresponsibility.
This rule described the effect and consequences that a commission determination of nonresponsibility has upon the person or contractor which has been disqualified under the provisions of this chapter.
Date Posted: 3/10/26
Summary: This rule has been in effect since July 9, 1991. The proposed amendment and rescissions are needed now to streamline contractor oversight, reduce administrative burden, and align with current best practices in performance recognition and procurement. The existing rating system is outdated and resource intensive. This rule is being rescinded to eliminate the annual rating of contractor performance.
Pending Proposal
7 CSR 10-10.090 Reservation of Rights to Recommend or Declare Persons or Contractors Nonresponsible on Other Grounds.
The Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission is amending section (1).
Date Posted: 3/10/26
Summary: This rule has been in effect since July 9, 1991. The proposed amendment and rescissions are needed now to streamline contractor oversight, reduce administrative burden, and align with current best practices in performance recognition and procurement. The existing rating system is outdated and resource intensive. This amendment removes the reference lo 7 CSR 10-10.030.